Saturday, 23 February 2013

Diagnosing / Assessment in Executive Coaching




Association of Bangalore Coaches
February 19
Join Steve Correa 630 PM on 21 February Thursday at Christ University. Come strike or no strike, ABC goes on, free with tea! cheers ram
Like ·  · Share


Steve briefly outlined the key differences between Coaching with Consulting, Counseling, and Mentoring.

He argued that the way we think, feel and act creates our reality and the experience of it. That all of us carry a ‘map’ inside, that is shaped also by how we want to be seen by society. Essentially then, we each become what we have ourselves designed – we deserve what we get.

Steve emphasized that the first step is to realize this. To become aware of our thoughts, feelings and behavior at all times. All change begins with this. You need to know, ‘what you don’t know you don’t know’. It is only then can one move to Right action.  He then went on to explain the Coaching Philosophy and stated as under:

The client owns the problem, the outcomes, the current reality, the data on the current reality, the pieces of the current jigsaw - it is for him / her to intervene and make the self-disclosure. It is for him to own the insight, and to open up the possibilities of options, to weigh each of the options and select, the path ahead to the desired outcome. Also, to set a roadmap and milestone for the way. The role of the Coach is the mirror.
Steve pointed out that in order to widen the perspective, the client must examine several systems – the interpersonal, the intra-personal, intra psychic and also intra existential. Through deeper and wider personal enquiry (aka reflection), the client begins to get a deeper understanding around Who am I? What am I? How come I think, feel and act this way? This introspection allows the client to review the multiple identities he has ‘acted’ from, and the multiple ‘roles’ he has played and continues to play. By and by he comes to realize, that many roles were played with ‘handed down rules, diktats and belief systems’. In this process the client learns to examine his own belief systems, his own hidden assumptions, and his preferences to act and think in a particular way.
Steve argues that, in every event (location) it offers choices to act, within the role. Given these choices, how do we act? Do we relate with Spontaneous awareness or with compulsivity, and wherein is this source? Steve comments that over the years the Self (the atman) takes on various identities, multiple personas, that form our personality. Steve argues that our personality is constructed – it is not our true nature. Right action he argues springs from being located at one’s core, not displaced to the left or the right (the extremes). Here there is an awakened response, and freedom from diktat of the ‘role’.
The ego comes from the ‘identity’ wishing to perpetuate itself – it is the shadow of the self. The ego is the property of the mind. Unless we ‘lighten up’ the shadow, it will not fall away. Acceptance of one’s nature (self) and acting from one’s location is freedom and responsibility. To ‘expect’ from a role, either ourselves or from others is to eventually be disappointed. ‘Accept, not Expect’ he argued.
The coaching process is to help client articulate the inarticulate, act the withheld, own the disowned, and to make that which was invisible, visible. Truly then, the role of assessment tools and diagnostics is not to get an understanding of what is. For what is, is what is not. The tools are ‘devices’ to support crucial conversations that offer an understanding around the way we think, feel and act. By itself there are ‘chess boards’ – either just wooden pieces to some, or a complete action dynamic for someone else. It is awareness that makes it one or the other.
Using diagnosis tools, or Assessment tools then could be either an invitation to explore one’s personal interiority and the relationships with others and society. Used as an indictment, to label someone, ‘this is you’ would be a violation. At the core, the tool is for the use of the client, and not for the coach or worse the organization to make ‘decisions’.
Steve went on to share personal experiences of several tools that he has been using, and familiar with – self assessment, 360 feedback, psychometric tools, Getalt, NLP, etc. He tasked about tests to check multiple proficiencies, etc, also to gauge multiple intelligence, etc. The participants in the programme also shared their experiences in using some of these tools. Steve also spoke about leading service providers, SHL ( he is an SHL assessor), SHRM and NTL as a few examples of what they do.
Steve pointed out that the list of tools and assessment go up each day, with dozens being added. He cautioned again, that the tools were mere devices – the whole purpose is to lead to the ‘jump site’ – it is the fall that does it, not the device. Either a climb up 88 steps, or a move to the cliff – it is the fall that does it, the clients’ own surrender – the plunge. His own commitment to growth. The role of the coach is to hold the space, to be the calm in the storm. The coach and the client become one. The musician and the instrument disappear, just the music remains, the dancer disappear, only the dance remains. It is only when client experiences the ‘ah ah’ moment that truth is experienced and deep insight follows.
Several questions and reflections were made during the talk and post it. Someone asked, how important is one tool to another, how does one choose? Steve shared that each tool lends itself more readily to a context, but that’s not the point. He argues that any tool would do eventually. For when the learner is ready, the learning begins, when the student is ready, the master arrives. Steve added that of all tools, meditation was to him, the best.
Someone asked about Silence and the role it played. Silence and Deep listening he argued were the two key competencies of Coaching, he argued.
Several Coaches who were present (D.Harish, Dhruva Sen) also shared their reflections on the talk. They were some very young audiences – students who asked a few questions.

Monday, 4 February 2013

Stay Steadfast – any path will do and will lead to success.



Stay Steadfast – any path will do and will lead to success.



Any path you choose will support your growth to Leadership! There is no one particular path. Like the saying, all roads will lead to Rome. Having said that, it is critical to stay steadfast to a particular path, you will not succeed if you deter away from your goal. It is the commitment that will make you succeed. Abandoning something halfway is the issue why we fail to succeed. One needs to be total. One ought to relentlessly pursue what one desires, and with an unflinching resolve. To ensure that one must persevere in the worst of times. Existence unfolds its full bounty to anyone who digs deep, who continues to trudge along, despite whatever. In my work as an Executive Coach, I have come to realize that in order to succeed, there are three simple steps:

1.     Am I clear what I want?
2.     Do I know the price I have to pay to get to realize my goals?
3.     Actually, paying the price along the way.

Most folks who are successful tend to offer three reasons for their success:

·      Hard work and steadfast pursuit of their vision
·      Encouragement from their spouse
·      Fortune to be ‘lucky’ – being in the right place at the right time.


Any methodology that is devised has one intrinsic principle – to support awareness and continuous learning. Growth is ever present in all forms – that is its very nature. It is like a circle. Whichever way you move forward you will reach the center from the circumference. It is changing one’s part midway that deters you away and makes you get lost along the way. Like an arrow that has left the bow, it must move towards the target, it should not change it path along the way. What brings one home is totality, unconditional commitment, and dedication. What matters then is not the path, but these conditions. Years ago my brother, once shared with me, ‘When I choose one thing, I tend to appreciate my choice fully, I don’t think of my other choices, lest they linger within’.  Years later I realize how wise his words were.

With these conditions and without the path, one can still reach, and yet one who is on the correct path, but without these qualities will not reach her destination. For the one who leads, who is a true Leader, he must imbue in his followers, a steadfastness to stay the course. In order to do this, although he is aware that all paths are useful, he deliberately condemns them. It is not with deception, but in order to ensure, his followers do not have doubts, on his leading them towards the goal. He knows that Trust in him, is what would make them follow, and in order to succeed, he knows that his followers must have deep belief. A belief or faith that is unshakeable.

When Jesus said, “I am the truth, I am the way and the light”, he was not wishing to confirm that there is only ONE path to the Kingdom of Heaven. He being an enlightened leader, would know that more than anybody else, that any path would suffice.  Hinduism has offered in its all-embracing manner, that all paths lead to the ultimate path to Truth.  

Truth is, that the journey of Leadership is the path within. When one moves away from the circumference and moves to the centeredness, he gets to that point of personal awareness where he views everything with a deeper perspective. Away from the circumference, he is free from all the vicissitudes of life storming at the surface. At the core of his being, he sees everything with heightened awareness and realizes the true nature of things.



The role of the coach is to support the client traverse the path. He begins with clarifying the Goals and values of the pursuit; the commitment to reach one’s goal, and the price one is willing to pay. His role is to ‘be the mirror’ to the client, continuously helping to bring to his awareness, lessons and insights along the way. To work assiduously with the client develop options and strategies as he overcomes internal and external barriers. To be there for the client, acknowledging him, for his commitment, yet prepared to confront him, if he is untrue to himself. Celebrating each milestone, forever encouraging.

In the end, both Coach and Client are aware that the journey is self-traversed. The client will need to take responsibility for the goal and own the process. The path to leadership cannot be taught, but it can be learnt.  It has to be self realized, it has to be self-understood. No other can beam the light, one must, as Buddha advises, shine and follow one’s own light.  Jidu Krishnamurthy once remarked, ‘ to traverse the path one needs no Master’. Masters are there only to help support you with devices. No devices are needed. In the end, whether you fall gradually or at once, it is not the path, but the ‘drop’, that does it.  We are all bodhisattvas, all natural leaders. Some will take a shorter while to get there, some longer.

When followers get to the place they seek, it is not without reason that they feel that they got there by themselves. True Leaders lead silently. When the job is done, everyone believes they correctly got there by their own efforts.

In truth, staying true to the present, is what is crucial in the relationship. The role of the coach is to be with the client’s present reality. While the client pursues the goal, the role of the coach is to ever stay with his client, in the moment.  The role of the coach is to stay unattached to what the client seeks, but to support and be caught with the purpose of helping the client clarify his thinking and feelings that leads to purposive action.

For in the ultimate analysis, the motivation of all human behavior is guided by a deep desire to be happy. While being happy is a universal driver, what makes one happy differs from the other. Our experienced reality of the world is but an expression of how we think, feel and act. Changing the way, we think, we feel about others, and ourselves, and acting from personal awareness, is what will finally get us to our divine purpose. 

Tuesday, 22 January 2013

Personal Reflections - Creating High Performance Organisations






Personal Reflections - Creating High Performance Organisations

At the outset, let me refer to a standard reference point – The Oxford Dictionary to define an organization which is reproduced as under:

Definition of organization
noun
•   1an organized group of people with a particular purpose, such as a business or government department: a research organization

•   2 [mass noun] the action of organizing something: the organization of conferences

•   the quality of being systematic and efficient: his lack of organization

3 [mass noun] the way in which the elements of a whole are arranged: the spatial organization of the cells

Next it is only logical to define what a High Performance Organisation is? For this, I borrow from the work done by the Centre of Creative Leadership. They extracted five definitions from various literature and which in summary they identified as that organization wherein the following attributes exist:

·      Self- managing work teams
·      Employee involvement, participation, empowerment
·      Total quality management
·      Integrated production technologies and
·      The learning organization

Again these five are contextual to time and will re-change depending on the external environment.

CCL goes on to define performance organization as one, “the achievement of organizational goals in pursuit of business strategies that lead to sustainable business advantages”. Each organization may have a different benchmark for what it values, hence this definition may not be comparable across organisations. To avoid this dilemma, a revised definition was offered, “an organizational systems that continually aligns its strategies, goals and objectives, and internal operations with the demands of its external environment to maximize organsiational performance’.

Thus far, I have begun by referring to references, which have been put together with much research and after much deliberate thought. It is time I make a departure and share a personal story of my privilege to being part of a High Performance Organisation.

Let me begin my story…

I joined Hutchison Max (now Vodafone India) in February 2000. At that time, cellular penetration in India was in low single digit penetration. DOT had issued licenses (two operators per licensed state). In November 2002, the third operator was introduced, and by 2004, multiple licenses per state were issued, to our current stage where we have more 7 – 9 operators per licensed state. Single GSM technology later competed with CDMA, and then later 3G, now LTE. Microwave was an earlier carrier giving way to fibre cables that now connect us across not just India, but gateways to the world.

One thing was clear from the beginning: the inflection point was inevitable. The opportunity for Explosive Growth was a ours for the taking, but how rapidly would it explode, was the question, and more importantly would we seize the moment? The hockey stick effect was waiting to happen. All data from matured Telco’s pointed to this across the world, so how do you prepare the organization to deal with this explosive growth? We were without doubt one of THE high performance Indian companies of the decade, we didn't get there just because we rode a wave. We anticipated the wave, geared up for it, paced our investments and effort, and so lasted the course. We worked with ONE QUARTER the equity of bharti, stayed away from distractions like long distance and fixed line and dotcom (talk of strategic rigour), managed complex jv partnerships which none of our Indian competitors had to, and so 'survived to victory'! When I started, there were 32 foreign Telco’s in some measure of control in India. When I left, hutch/VODA was the ONLY one of the major foreign major Telco competing. Many had long departed years earlier. There was intensely complex chess playing, in a complex and hostile (to fdi) regulatory environment, that got us there, and a number of clear cultural differences. We started at 135 k subs, and when I left for UK we were roughly 60 mn - I forget exactly how many. I don't think we were just riding the boom, we created the foundation for a low price model way before others, rural penetration models, etc. And so anticipated, planned for and executed for the 'survival to victory'

Asim Ghosh, who lead the Indian team to what has now become the top ten telcos in the world, once famously shared at a management conference, “ it would be unfair to believe that we are causing the growth. In fact it is the other way around. Growth is causing us to implode, we are rapidly whitewater rafting in the speed of the river. The river of opportunity is doing all the work. We are just making sure we stay afloat on the raft, and don’t lose our market share in this sunshine that is now happening in India”.  We are grateful to our shareholders who hold us in faith, to our employees who are working against all odds to build up the infrastructure, to the external authorities who support the tele-density that contributes to the GDP. But most of us, we are grateful to our customers, who reward us for staying focused. We are focused on our customers, ‘buy or make’ are strategic calls, we are not concerned with our competitors. We are obsessed with beating ourselves. This was the humility of the man – to ascribe the success to all others. A great leader is one, when the job is done, everyone feels they had created it together!

Brand Orange was launched in Mumbai in February 2000. The brand spoke about Values: it was Friendly, Open, Human, At Hutch, we all came to realize that the brand was ‘making a promise’ that is all our marketing guys could do, and they made that promise so tantalizing. Yet it was up to each individual to offer the ‘delivery of the promise’ through the actual experience that the customer would have. It was the brand experience, and making that happen that created the shared purpose – to live our values. To make the inside out, and the outside off! Think about it, what do you really offer as a telco – a sim card, towers, customer service? All services are enjoyed, in the moment of consumption – a flight service is experienced in flight, an hour before and an hour after. In comparison, the service of a telco is a 24X7 experience. You have a point of view on it each moment. So how do you build a compelling Customer Service Experience? An experience that begins with onboarding, off boarding, and through the life cycle of consumption?

The best practices of the day are misnomers – they are at best, practices that have worked in the past. To be successful, an organization needs to constantly seek the ‘next practice’. Consultants that charge huge fees only can share history, they cannot share what will work well for you now. Clearly, what has worked well in the past is no guarantee that it will succeed in the future. The book, ‘Black Swan’ describes this even more fully. Asim always distinguished between long term truths, eg being customer friendly, low cost, simple processes, no bureaucracy versus conventional 'proper' practices. All motherhood, but we practiced it; for us it was real.


So one needs to constantly make adjustments to the environment, constantly working with the inside making it relevant to the outside – always being adaptive to change. One learns to join the dots, to see the picture become more clearer over time.

Defining a set of Values and behaviors is one step in building a high performance culture. At Hutch, we used a simple analogy of whitewater rafting – all the attributes of those brave men on the raft, would help clarify the behaviors we sought: managing speed, ambiguity, ‘a can do attitude’, intellectual honesty, trust, managing personal hardships, etc.  Through these simple analogy a framework of competencies were established. However, a brand is what a brand does, say Arun Sarin and here living the values was key.

The monthly review meetings were a ritual of demonstrating values in action: each circle was expected to compete fiercely with the others for the high honors, yet all the others were expected to ‘steal with pride’ the best practices. What was being said, was more important than who said what. The role of top leadership is to protect a few critical things: one of them is to challenge the status quo, the other to nurture the culture of openness. All other people practices come later – they are at best hygiene. There was a balance between intense pressure to perform married to a caring for and loyalty to people - the magic is how to marry the two so that it does not become either a comfortable club or an impersonal organization of hit and run transactional artists. The execo was just one tool albeit a critical one - there were many others. Our smses were real time, and HAD to be answered immediately. Likewise our phone calls. Compare that to a competitor ( shall go unnamed), where the calls would never be picked up. There were formal communication channels, but also a host of real time informal channels. The key is that the latter were all business oriented, never political. And witness the few people who were not real time - they didn't last the course.

We encouraged conflict and disagreement of ideas, but not of people (except for one high performance individual). And we did not tolerate bs, salesmanship - there was a high premium on substance over style. We tolerated a high degree of stylistic differences.

We had a lean head office, but a critical control tool to create harmonization of culture, processes and results without actually creating a head office run company.

Leaders were expected to lead from the front, give credit for successes, but shield the troops for failure, at least once or twice. Sounds like bs, but think of the several failed starts in 1800 circles till we got it right when an mnc would simply have fired the messenger. We had our moments of crisis. When the environment turned hostile ( as it did in once critical incident, and I do not wish to go into details) we kept our cool and did not succumb to pressure. We stood by our values, and continued to stay focused. We knew that the ‘truth would set us free’.

Over 10 years, we lost maybe max 5 of our top 50 management? The key was not just the fun people were having, but we had developed a real sense of being an elite organization because of our differentiated positioning, showing up in superior way.


Hutch grew with small acquisitions and regularly, as it expanded. As new opportunities opened up several ‘start-ups’ were initiated to seize emerging opportunities. The Indian market moved from high value consumers to high density populace. Innovation comes from the womb of necessity – the ‘chotta recharge’ was the equivalent of the sachet story. It widened the market, creating new usage trends.

Almost every quarter, we saw ourselves at a crossroad – this way or that! Choices needed to be made: on markets, on technology, on managing through the regulations.

As ARPU started to plummet, so too under threat were declining EBITDA’s and the need to find ‘alternatives’ to improved costs to serve. Enter, the new world of outsourcing.  At Hutch we redefined the term to service partners, those who were aligned with our objectives, not just vendors who would profit by it.

Strategy is a privilege of a few. A failed strategy is an orphan, success has many parents. A good strategy is not enough. Asim would always remind us – Strategy is ACTION.  It was our ability to execute faster, quicker and deeper that was our competitive advantage – our differentiation.

What was a 5 million subscriber base is now 600+ million and growing. To feed this infrastructure unprecedented had to be created. Systems and processes had to be introduced in an industry which at its backend resembled an Engineering Company, in the middle a service organization and at the front end, an FMCG.  Competencies had to be acquired and built internally to support this chimera of an organization.

To me Hutch symbolized a case study one was involved with in the making, each day, with a new twist to the tale. Each day at work was like a comma, there was no full stop. Retention was high. A headhunter once asked a senior manager – the job I offer you pays better, has higher responsibility, what makes you stay on here? He replied, “I have friends here. I enjoy what I do”.

High performance organisations are built around a band of people who believe there are ‘core’ to the shared purpose. Who work meaningfully and challenge each other constantly questioning the status quo. Who believe in ‘keeping the faith’ and building an institution larger than themselves. Those who practice intellectual honesty in whatever they do, and strive to outperform themselves. Those who believe they are EBITDA partners, not employees.

Someone once said to me, ‘when I hang my boots on the proverbial fireplace, and I share stories of Hutch with my grandchildren, I am sure I would say – I lived through interesting times”.


To me, an organization culture must respond to the WHY for each one, then only to the What and later to the How. To me, culture is an outcome, it is not a given. A culture is what you create.  It needs two parents: the male adhikar – the strategy and the feminine anurag – the values. It is this integration of strategy and values that create the work processes, the management systems, the communication channels, the authority levels, the rewards and recognition mechanism, the quality systems, etc. When these devices are aligned with the core values/strategy they transcend to create the winning culture. Be not fooled by those who would urge you to build Vision Statements that adorn boardrooms but are still born. Those that would steer you to expensive management schools to learn ‘dead practices’. Not the ‘flavour of the month – latest fads and mantras. These are the false prophets. True culture is discovered each day, like a wet mudpack that sticks, it becomes YOU. It clarifies, it defines and it acts as the North Star. It is trusting oneself and others. In not knowing the answers but in asking the right questions. To put one brick on the wall each day, to make it stronger for tomorrow. It is about being a little smarter than you were the day before. It is about embracing the adversity head on, welcoming the bad news. It is about doing things a little smarter than the other. Discovering the premium in the mass market. It is trusting one’s instinct and not a theory.




In April 2007, Hutch got acquired by Vodafone, Plc – a wonderful moment for it to enter its next phase! The story continues!



<a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/QCB3VLQ">Click here to take survey</a>